Wrong.

Journalists love to write articles on language. Not only, since they make their livings with words, do they have a professional interest in the topic, but language is a popular topic. People, at least those who read newspapers, love to read about it. The problem is that journalists often get it completely wrong.

A case in point is an article by Dan Bilefsky that appeared on the front page of the New York Times on 9 June about how use of the period, that staid and boring punctuation mark, is changing. In some forms of discourse, the period does not simply mark the end of a sentence, it conveys urgency or emotion. He gets the facts right, but Bilefsky utterly miscategorizes what is happening, framing the period as “going out of style” and “being felled.” Nothing could be further from the truth.

Read the rest of the article...

Web of Language

Linguist Dennis Baron’s blog about language in the news.

Strong Language

A blog about swearing with contributions by a number of language experts.

Sesquiotica

A blog about language by writer James Harbeck.

Sentence First

An Irishman’s blog about language by writer Stan Carey.

Lexicon Valley

Slate’s blog about language.

Slate’s podcast about language.

Harmless Drudgery

A blog by Kory Stamper, a lexicographer at Merriam-Webster.

Explorations of Style

A blog about academic writing by Rachel Cayley, a teacher of writing for the School of Graduate Studies at the University of Toronto.

DCBlog (David Crystal)

Linguist David Crystal’s blog.

Powered by ExpressionEngine
Copyright 1997-2016, by David Wilton