BL: notorious
Posted: 01 November 2013 03:33 AM   [ Ignore ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6241
Joined  2007-01-03

No, not the Hitchcock film

Profile
 
 
Posted: 01 November 2013 05:15 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Moderator
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1140
Joined  2007-03-01

Somewhat parallel to egregious, then. If it stands out from the norm, it’s bad.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 01 November 2013 07:46 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Moderator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2642
Joined  2007-02-19

it’s not often that a movie has three of my favourite actors in it (North by Northwest had two of them). The use of the word in the movie title is a bit ambiguous: if it’s a reference to the Bergman character, it implies that a person can be notorious not for any action of their own, but because of someone they are connected to, even if the connection itself is innocent.  In the same way, one might characterize, say, the wife and children of The Godfather as notorious persons. I don’t think I’d want to use the word in that way myself.

I never, ever would have thought to call Harry Truman a “notorious” person --- but I’m hardly surprised to hear of him doing so himself (signed --- an ardent Truman admirer)

Profile
 
 
   
 
 
‹‹ kick the ballistics      Name that thing... ››