ergonomics

13 October 2014

I was listening to a podcast in which the astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson stated that he was under the impression that the discipline of ergonomics arose when the baby boomers started growing old and began feeling aches and pains. Of course, I had to immediately research the origin of the term, and it turns out Tyson’s impression is incorrect. (To be fair, Tyson wasn’t stating it as fact and expressed his own skepticism as to whether or not it was true.)

It seems the term ergonomics was coined in 1949 by British psychologist K. F. Hywel Murrell (1908–84). That same year Murrell as several colleagues founded the Ergonomics Research Society. The Oxford English Dictionary’s first citation of the term in a published work is from the 1 April 1950 issue of the medical journal The Lancet, when that journal made mention of the society that Murrell had founded. The word is modeled after economics, but uses the Greek ἔργον, or ergon, meaning work, as the root.

So the term comes much too early to be the result of aging baby boomers, the first of whom were only toddlers when the term and the discipline came into existence.


Source:

“ergonomics, n.” The Oxford English Dictionary, second edition, 1989.

enthusiasm / enthuse

14 February 2015

The meanings of words change over time. Sometimes words become more specialized; the Old English deor was used to refer to any kind of wild beast, but by the end of the thirteenth century had started to be used specifically to refer to the creature we now call a deer. Other words become more general; one such is enthusiasm.

Enthusiasm comes into English from Greek, where it refers to the state of being possessed by a god. It was a religious term for a state of divine ecstasy or frenzy. A poet, for instance, might be filled with enthusiasm by his muse. The Latin and Greek meaning was the sense of the word when it was first used in English.

Edmund Spenser uses the Greek word in his 1579 Shepheardes Calendar for the month of October, saying that poetry is:

a diuine gift and heauenly instinct not to bee gotten by laboure and learning, but adorned with both: and poured into the witte by a certaine ἐνθουσιασμός and celestiall inspiration

Within a few decades, the word had been anglicized. Philemon Holland, in his 1603 translation of Plutarch’s Morals, writes:

The Dæmons use to make their prophets and prophetesses to be ravished with an Enthusiasme or divine fury.

By the beginning of the eighteenth century, enthusiasm had become generalized and was not always used in a religious sense or in reference to poetry. Now it could mean any passion or intense feeling toward someone or something, which is how it’s most commonly used today. So White Kennett could, in 1716, write a letter containing:

The King of Sweden [...] must have much more enthusiasm in him to put it in execution.

But the shifts in meaning were not finished. By the beginning of the twentieth century, an enthusiasm could also be a temporary fad or craze or a hedonistic indulgence, and James Joyce could write in his 1916 A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man about Stephen Dedalus’s youthful revels and carousing:

The letters cut in the stained wood of the desk stared upon him, mocking his bodily weakness and futile enthusiasms and make him loathe himself for his own mad and filthy orgies.

But enthusiasm has given us yet another linguistic shift; it has been formed into the verb to enthuse. The verb is much derided. Style maven Bryan Garner says it “is a widely criticized back-formation avoided by writers and speakers who care about the language. Even the OED, in an entry written in 1891, calls it “an ignorant back-formation.” But the verb is older than many may think.

It’s first recorded in 1827, in a letter by botanist David Douglas:

My humble exertions will I trust convey and enthuse, and draw attention to the beautifully varied verdure of N.W. America.

Douglas was a Scotsman who traveled and spent many years in the Pacific Northwest of North America. Enthuse is distinctly North American, and it tends to be used in more informal registers. Use of the verb is becoming more common, and it is inching its way into more formal contexts. So despite the best efforts of language purists, it has been making steady progress over the last two centuries.

That’s quite a journey in a mere four centuries, from religious ecstasy to boozing it up and sowing one’s wild oats, with detours into fads and gushing praise.


Sources:

Garner, Bryan A.; Garner’s Modern American Usage, third edition; s.v. enthuse, vb.; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Oxford English Dictionary, second edition; s.v. enthusiasm, n., enthuse, v.; 1989.

Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage; s.v. enthuse; Springfield: Merriam-Webster, 1994.

emoji

31 May 2016

Selection of representative emoji

Selection of representative emoji

Emoji are pictograms used in electronic communications. An emoji is a digital icon used to express an emotion or idea, a twenty-first century updating of the old ascii emoticons like the winking face, ;-), used to mark a joke or sarcasm. 

The etymology is rather straightforward, but may be a bit surprising to some. It’s a borrowing from Japanese, which shouldn’t surprise anyone, but the origin has nothing to do with emotion, as the emo- might suggest. Instead it’s a compounding of e-, meaning picture, and -moji, meaning a letter or character. The word in Japanese dates to at least 1928, and it may be a calque of the English pictograph, which has the same picture-character elements. So the Japanese may have borrowed it from English, translated it into Japanese, and then given the Japanese version back to English.

English use of emoji dates to 1997, when it appears in the Nikkei Weekly, an English-language Japanese newspaper. The first citation in the OED from a non-Japanese source is from Wired magazine in 2001.


Source:

Oxford English Dictionary, third edition, December 2013, s. v. emoji, n.

dirigible

6 May 2017

Today, the word dirigible is almost always used as a noun, referring to a zeppelin-type airship, and I always had it in my head that the word was related to rigid, a reference to the rigid frame of such an aircraft. But that is not the case. The word began life as an adjective meaning capable of being directed or steered. It was formed from the Latin verb dirigere, meaning to direct, steer, or guide. So a dirigible is a steerable balloon.

The adjective dates to the late sixteenth century but in the 1880s began to be applied specifically to balloons. By 1907 the word was being used as a noun to refer to Ferdinand von Zeppelin’s airships.

Cf. airshipblimpzeppelin.


Source:

Oxford English Dictionary, second edition, 1989, s. v. dirigible, adj. and n.

deplatform

4 May 2019

The verb deplatform is rather new. It’s not yet in the major dictionaries, so I’ll attempt a definition:

To disinvite a speaker from an event or to remove a user a from a social media platform due to their use of hate speech, engaging in harassment, or violation of the platform’s rules.

The earliest use of the term that I’ve been able to find is in a discussion of a video game that allows users to hit fascist protesters with a purse.

Danuta Danielsson hitting a Neo-Nazi with her handbag in Växjö, Sweden 1985. Photograph by Hans Runesson.

Danuta Danielsson hitting a Neo-Nazi with her handbag in Växjö, Sweden 1985. Photograph by Hans Runesson.

The game is Handväska! (Swedish for “handbag”) and was inspired by a famous 1985 photo of Danuta Danielsson hitting a Swedish Neo-Nazi marcher with her purse. Danielsson was a Polish Jew living in Sweden whose mother had survived Auschwitz. The game was created in 2017 and reported on by the Australian gaming website Kotaku.com on 10 February 2017. Comments on the article developed into a broader discussion of how to address hate speech and included this:

I’m not saying that any group is required to take this shitstain seriously or give him a platform to speak. I would much rather see hate speech law actually enforced against him than not.

Delegitimise and deplatform people like this through ridicule or argument. Disrupt their ability to speak through non-violent protest.

A few days later, 22 February, deplatform was used on the American website Salon.com:

Everybody loves free speech until they don’t. The exact opposite is the case with “deplatforming,” which is what recently happened to former Breitbart editor and professional troll Milo Yiannopoulos. He was originally scheduled to speak this week at the Conservative Political Action Conference but saw his invitation rescinded after videos resurfaced in which he appeared to defend pedophilia.

Initially, deplatforming was primarily used to refer to rescinding an invitation to speak at an event, as in the Yiannopoulos case referenced in the Salon quote. But the term has widened to include banning those with controversial views from social media platforms, as it is in the December 2018 article on Mashable.com:

Over the past year, internet companies wielded the hammer known as “deplatforming” more than ever. Deplatforming, or no-platforming, is the term for kicking someone off social media or other sites when they break the rules by, say, using hate speech, or participating in harassment campaigns. Getting deplatformed means that the rule-breaker can no longer use that platform to share their thoughts or feelings with the world.

Deplatforming is, itself, a controversial tactic. Those who have been deplatformed often claim that their rights to “free speech” have been violated, which may be true in some cases where a public university (i.e., the government) has disinvited a speaker. Others claim that while it is legal, it violates the idea that challenging abhorrent views in the “marketplace of ideas” is the best way to counter them. Others disagree, saying that deplatforming is a prime example of the marketplace of ideas in action. The tactic does, however, seem to be effective, in that people with odious views like Yiannopolous and Alex Jones have seen their influence drop markedly after losing their platforms.


Sources:

Alexandra, Heather, “A Game Where You Go Bowling for Fascists,” Kotaku.com.au.

Kraus, Rachel. “2018 Was the Year We (Sort of) Cleaned Up the Internet.” Mashable.com. 26 December 2018.

Torres, Phil. “Milo, Donald Trump and the Outer Limits of Hate Speech: When Does Absolute Freedom of Speech Endanger Democracy?” Salon.com, 22 February 2017.