Brunswick / New Brunswick

British Revolutionary War map of New Brunswick, New Jersey, c.1777. A pen-and-ink and watercolor drawing, showing topographic relief by shading of an area crossed by the Raritan River. Roads, troop positions, and military emplacements are shown and numbered, with a key at the bottom identifying them.

British Revolutionary War map of New Brunswick, New Jersey, c.1777. A pen-and-ink and watercolor drawing, showing topographic relief by shading of an area crossed by the Raritan River. Roads, troop positions, and military emplacements are shown and numbered, with a key at the bottom identifying them.

29 June 2021

Brunswick is a city in Lower Saxony whose name comes from the Middle Low German Burnswik, from Brun (Bruno) + wik (settlement). The city was legendarily founded by Bruno, Duke of Saxony, in 861. The modern name is Braunschweig,

The North American New Brunswicks, a province in Canada and a city in New Jersey, United States, are named after the Hanoverian English kings George III and George I, respectively, who also held the title of Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg.

Of course, there were people living in the places that are called New Brunswick before Europeans settled there and renamed them. The inhabitants of the province of New Brunswick at the time of European contact were the Mi'kmaq, the Maliseet, and the Passamaquoddy. Since the province is a settler-colonist construct, I don’t know of an indigenous name that corresponds to the province as a whole, but the capital, Fredericton is located near the site of the Maliseet settlement of Ekwpahak (end of the tide) and the largest city in the province, Moncton, is located at a place known to the Mi’kmaq as Amalamgog (the delta where the multicolored rivers meet).

The indigenous inhabitants of the area containing the New Jersey city of New Brunswick were the Lenape or Delaware, who refer to their land as Lenapehoking (land of the Lenape). Lenapehoking encompassed all of what is called by settler-colonists New Jersey and the surrounding parts of New York (including all of New York City), Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Delaware.

Of the two, the city in New Jersey has borne the name New Brunswick for longer, since at least 1735, when this advertisement appeared in the New-York Weekly Journal on 9 February:

To be Sold,

The Real Estate in the Provinces of New-York and New-Jersey, whereof Major General Hunter, deceased, died seized, consisting of the following Particulars, viz.

1. The House and Lott on the Dock near the Ferry Stars of New-York, in which Coll. Lurting, late Mayor of this City lived.

[...]

5. A 500 Acre Lott of Land on the South Side of the Raritan River, about 3 Miles above New-Brunswick, formerly Richard Jones’s, lying between Governour Barclay’s Lott and Clement’s Lott.

The Canadian province was separated from Nova Scotia in 1784, and a notice of the appointment of the province’s first governor is recorded on 28 July of that year:

28. The hon. William Wesley Pole, appointed by the lord lieutenant of Ireland to be governor of the Queen’s county.

—. Colonel Thomas Carleton, to be captain-general and governor in chief of the province of New Brunswick.

Discuss this post


Sources:

“Advertisement.” New-York Weekly Journal, 9 February 1735, 4.

Brookes, Alan and William W. Thorpe. “Fredericton.” The Canadian Encyclopedia, 6 March 2019.

Everett-Heath, John. Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Place Names, sixth ed. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2020. Oxfordreference.com.

Oxford English Dictionary, third edition, December 2020, s.v. Brunswick, n.

Pearce, Margaret Wickens. Coming Home to Indigenous Place Names in Canada (map). Canadian-American Center, University of Maine, 2017.

“Principal Occurrences in the Year 1784.” The New Annual Register or General Repository of History, Politics, and Literature, for the Year 1784. London: G.G.J. and J. Robinson, 1785, 117. Eighteenth Century Collections Online (ECCO).

Rayburn, Alan. Oxford Dictionary of Canadian Place Names. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford UP Canada, 1999.

Image credit: Alexander Sutherland and John Hills, c.1777. Library of Congress. Public domain image.

Virginia / West Virginia

1606 map of the Tidewater region of Virginia, showing the colony of Jamestown, among others. In the upper left is an image of the Powhatan, the chief of the Tsenacommacah. In the upper right is an indigenous hunter/warrior, carrying a bow, a club, and the body of an animal he has killed.

1606 map of the Tidewater region of Virginia, showing the colony of Jamestown, among others. In the upper left is an image of the Powhatan, the chief of the Tsenacommacah. In the upper right is an indigenous hunter/warrior, carrying a bow, a club, and the body of an animal he has killed.

25 June 2021

Tsenacommacah is the Powhatan term for the Tidewater region and surrounding lands in what is now commonly called Virginia. The word was also used to refer to a socio-political grouping of Algonquian peoples living there, the Powhatan Confederacy. The meaning of Tsenacommacah is somewhat uncertain, but it is often translated as “densely inhabited land,” a compound of tsen (close together) + ahkamikwi (land dwelt upon, dwelling house).

But when English settler-colonists founded their first colonies there, they dubbed the land Virginia, after Elizabeth I, the so-called virgin queen. Originally, Virginia referred to all English claims to North America, not just the area we now know by that name. But since the first successful English colony was in the Tidewater at Jamestown, the name eventually came to mean that and immediately surrounding areas and not other colonies elsewhere on the Eastern seaboard.

The earliest use of Virginia that I have found is from Walter Bigges’s account of Francis Drake’s 1585–86 expedition to raid the Spanish colonies in the Americas. Bigges was one of Drake’s ship captains. The passage refers to Drake’s June 1586 resupply of the Roanoke colony, which was in what is now North Carolina, but in the sixteenth century that was all Virginia. The reference to St. Helena is to St. Helena Island in what is now South Carolina and not to the island in the South Atlantic where Napoleon was exiled:

Here it was resolued in full assemblie of Captaines, to vndertake the enterprise of S. HELENA, and from thence to seeke out the inhabitation of our English countrey men in VIRGINIA, distant from thence some sixe degrees Northward.

When we came thwart of S. HELENA, the shols appearing daungerous, and we hauing no Pilot to vndertake the entrie, it was thought meetest to go hence alongst. For the Admirall had bene the same night in foure fadome and halfe three leagues from the shore: and yet we vnderstood, that by the helpe of a knowen Pilot, there may and doth go in ships of greater burthen and draught then anie we had in our Fleete.

We passed thus alongest the coast hard abord the shore, which is shallow for a league or two from the shore, and the same is lowe and broken land for the most part.

The ninth of Iune vpon sight of one speciall great fire (which are verie ordinarie all alongst this coast, euen from the Cape FLORIDA hither) the Generall sent his Skiffe to the shore, where they found some of our English countrey men (that had bene sent thither the yeare before by Sir Walter Raleigh) & brought one aboord, by whose direction we proceeded along to the place, which they make their Port. But some of our ships being of great draught vnable to enter, we ankered all without the harbour in a wild road at sea, about two miles from shore.

From whence the General wrote letters to Maister Rafe Lane, being Gouernour of those English in VIRGINIA, and then at his fort about six leagues from the rode in an Island, which they call ROANOAC, wherein specially he shewed how readie he was to supply his necessities and wants, which he vnderstood of, by those he had first talked withall.

The morrowe after Maister Lane him selfe and some of his companie comming vnto him, with the consent of his Captaines, he gaue them the choise of two offers, that is to say: Either he would leaue a ship, a Pinnace, and certaine boates with sufficient Maisters and mariners, together furnished with a moneths victuall to stay and make farther discouerie of the country and coastes, and so much victuall likewise that might be sufficient for the bringing of them all (being an hundred and three persons) into England if they thought good after such time, with anie other thing they would desire, & that he might be able to spare.

Or else if they thought they had made sufficient discouerie alreadie, and did desire to returne into England, he would giue them passage. But they as it seemed, being desirous to stay, accepted verie thankefully, and with great gladnesse that which was offred first.

Drake and his crew would be the last white men to see the ill-fated colonists of Roanoke.

Subsequently, Jamestown would become the first successful English colony in North America, and Virginia would be among the thirteen colonies that rebelled against Britain in 1775. On 25 June 1788, it became the tenth state to ratify the U.S. Constitution. The western region of the state, which had relatively few slaves and little political or commercial interest in breaking with the Union during the Civil War, split from the eastern portion of the state, becoming the state of West Virginia on 20 June 1863.

I also chanced upon 1609 use of Virginia that, while far from the first use of that name, is fascinating in its own right. It’s from the dedicatory epistle to a published version of a sermon delivered by William Symonds on 25 April 1609 in Southwark, London to an audience of prospective planters in Virginia:

This land, was of old time, offered to our Kings. Our late Soueraigne Q. Elizabeth (whose storie hath no peere among Princes of her sexe) being a pure Virgin, found it, set foot in it, and called it Virginia. Our most sacred Soueraigne, in whom is the spirit of his great Ancestor, Constantin t[h]e pacifier of the world, and planter of the Gospell in places most remote, desireth to present this land a pure Virgine to Christ. Such as doe mannage the expedition, are carefull to carry thither no Traitors, nor Papists that depend on the Great Whore. Lord finish this good worke thou hast begun; and marry this land, a pure Virgine to thy kingly sonne Christ Iesus; so shall thy name bee magnified: and we shall haue a Virgin or Maiden Britaine, a comfortable addition to our Great Britaine.

Of course, Elizabeth herself never “set foot” in North America, but the passage is representing the dual nature of the monarch’s body—the physical human body and the body of the nation she rules. It is this latter body that set foot in and established colonies in North America. The passage also invokes the Roman Emperor Constantine, who was campaigning in Britain when he became Emperor. By so doing it compares the current king, James I, who by establishing the Virginia colonies brought Christianity to the region, to the emperor who established Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire. And Symonds refers to America as “a Virgin or Maiden Britaine,” a place that, since it is untouched by sin, can be perfected as a Christian nation—a sentiment that was shared by the later Puritan colonists of New England, but not by the Virginia colonists, who were in it solely for the profit. The idea of “virgin” land also necessitates the erasure of the indigenous people already living there and is why today we call it Virginia and not Tsenacommacah.

Discuss this post


Sources:

Bigges, Walter. A Summarie and True Discourse of Sir Francis Drakes West Indian Voyage. London: Richard Field, 1589, 47–49. Early English Books Online (EEBO).

Everett-Heath, John. Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Place Names, sixth ed. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2020. Oxfordreference.com.

Gleach, Frederic W. Powhatan’s World and Colonial Virginia: A Conflict of Cultures. Lincoln: U of Nebraska Press, 1997, 25, 207.

Oxford English Dictionary, second edition, 1989, s.v. Virginia, n.

Symonds, William. “Dedicatorie Epistle.” A Sermon Preached at White-Chappel, in the Presence of Many, Honourable and Worshipfull, the Aduenturers and Planters for Virginia, 25 April 1609. London: I. Windet, 1609, unpaginated front matter. Early English Books Online (EEBO).

Whitt, Laurelyn and Alan W. Clarke. “The Powhatan Tsenacommacah (1607–1677).” North American Genocides: Indigenous Nations, Settler Colonialism, and International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2019, 117.

Image credit: John Smith and William Hole, 1606 (published 1624). Library of Congress. Public domain image.

shrew / shrewd

24 June 2021

1791 cartoon by James Gillray titled, The Taming of the Shrew: Katherine & Petruchio; — The Modern Quixotte, or, What You Will. The cartoon critiques the British attempt, with Prussian and Dutch support, to negotiate a truce in the Russia-Turkish War (1787–92). It depicts Catherine the Great of Russia fainting into the arms of the Holy Roman Emperor Leopold II and a figure representing France, while English Prime Minister William Pitt, as Don Quixote, points accusingly at Catherine, while he sits astride Rocinante, representing King George III of England. Sitting on the horse behind Pitt are the king of Prussia and a Sancho Panza figure representing Holland. Ottoman Sultan Selim III kneels behind the horse and kisses its tail. Russia, supported by France and the Holy Roman Empire, and is winning the war wants nothing to do with a negotiated peace, while Turkey, which is losing badly, desperately wants the war to end. George III, depicted as an emaciated and scarred, horse, simply does what Pitt tells him.

1791 cartoon by James Gillray titled, The Taming of the Shrew: Katherine & Petruchio; — The Modern Quixotte, or, What You Will. The cartoon critiques the British attempt, with Prussian and Dutch support, to negotiate a truce in the Russia-Turkish War (1787–92). It depicts Catherine the Great of Russia fainting into the arms of the Holy Roman Emperor Leopold II and a figure representing France, while English Prime Minister William Pitt, as Don Quixote, points accusingly at Catherine, while he sits astride Rocinante, representing King George III of England. Sitting on the horse behind Pitt are the king of Prussia and a Sancho Panza figure representing Holland. Ottoman Sultan Selim III kneels behind the horse and kisses its tail. Russia, supported by France and the Holy Roman Empire, and is winning the war wants nothing to do with a negotiated peace, while Turkey, which is losing badly, desperately wants the war to end. George III, depicted as an emaciated and scarred, horse, simply does what Pitt tells him.

A shrew is a small, insectivorous and carnivorous mammal of the genus Sorex. The common shrew, Sorex araneus, is found across Eurasia, from Mongolia to Britain. They resemble mice but are not rodents, being more closely related to moles and hedgehogs. But shrew also has a misogynist sense of a nagging, scolding, unpleasant woman. This latter sense of shrew is perhaps best known to people today through Shakespeare’s play The Taming of the Shrew. And this latter sense gave rise to the adjective shrewd, which now means clever or keen-witted, but originally meant something more malicious.

These two senses are difficult to reconcile. The general opinion is that the scold sense is a metaphorical development of the animal sense, coming from a folk belief that the creature wielded some malignant influence. Alternatively, the scold sense could have an independent origin, a borrowing of the Middle High German word schröuwel, meaning devil. Adding to the word’s strangeness is that it, or the animal sense at least, has no cognates in other Germanic languages, and its root meaning is unclear.

The name of the animal comes to us from the Old English screwa, a word that is attested in a number of Latin-Old English glossaries. Strangely, this sense isn’t attested in Middle English, reappearing in print in the sixteenth century. (There are many gaps in the early medieval corpus, but the Middle English corpus is quite large and filled with animal terms, so the word’s absence is odd.) One of the early reappearances of the animal sense is in Thomas Elyot’s 1542 Latin-English dictionary, in which Elyot gives a hint of the folkloric malign nature of the small creature:

Mus Arancus, a kynde of myse called a shrew, whyche yf it goo ouer a beastes backe, he shall be lame in the chyne, yf he doo byte any thynge, it swelleth vp to the hart, and the beaste dyeth.

(Mus Arancus, a kind of mouse called a shrew, which if it goes over a beast’s back, the beast shall be lame in the spine, if he does bite anything, the beast bitten swells up, and the beast bitten dies.)

While the animal sense isn’t attested in Middle English, the other sense of the word is. The earliest uses of the word shreue are in the sense of a rascal, an undisciplined child, an evil-doer,  but it is not specifically associated with women. An early appearance is in the debate-poem The Owl and the Nightingale from c. 1275:

Vor nere ich neuer no þe betere,
Yif ich mid chauling & mid chatere,
Home schende, & mid fule worde,
So herdes doþ, oþer mid schitworde.
Ne lust me with þe screwen chide:
Forþi ich wende from hom wide.
Hit is a wise monne dome,
& hi hit segget wel ilome,
Þat “me ne chide wit þe gidie”
Ne “wit þan ofne me ne ʒonie.”

(For I would not be better off if I abused them with idle talk and chatter and with foul words, as shepherds do, or with shit-words. I don’t want to quarrel with the shrews, therefore I give them a wide berth. It’s the judgment of wise men, & they say it often, that “there is no point in arguing with an idiot” than there is “yawning wider than an oven.”)

Shreue could also refer to a devil or a sinner, as in the life of St. James found in the South English Legendary, written c.1300. In this passage, a sinner kills himself and the devil claims his soul:

A-ʒein þe deuel he cam a-doun : and bad þane schrewe a-bide,
And seid, “þou berst more þane þin owe. : þat i schal kuyþe þe.
Ʒwi hast þou mine pilegrim be-traid? : gret schame þou dest me.”
“Ʒe. al for nauʒt,” quath þe schrewe : “thou art hidere i-come[”] :
[“]In his sunne him-sulf he a-slouʒ : and þare-with ich him habbe i-nome.
Ne may no man in dedlich sunne : in-to heuene wende.
Ase wel þou miʒht gon hom a-ʒein : he is min with-outen enden.”

(Again, the devil he came down and bid that the shrew wait, and said “you carry more than your own [sin], that I shall let you know. Why have you betrayed my pilgrim? You do me great shame.” “Yes, all for nothing,” said the shrew, “you have come here.” “In his sin he killed himself, and therefore I have taken him. No one in mortal sin can go to heaven, any more easily as he can go home again. He is mine without end.”

It’s about this time that the adjective shrewd appears with the meaning of wicked or malicious. In a passage about Pilate’s judgment of Christ, shrewd is used as an antisemitic slur from the Southern Passion, a poem that is part of the South English Legendary, written c.1280:

And Pilatus nas no gyw; Iustise þey he were,
Ak was of Paynyme; and þorw þemperour ysend ffram Rome
ffor to entempry þe gywes; and hold hem to riȝte dome.
Out aȝen þe shrewede gywes; pilatus wende anon
To affonge hare acoupementʒ; whanne he nolde yn gon.

(And Pilate was no Jew; ruler though he was,
But rather he was a pagan; and by the emperor sent from Rome
To restrain the Jews; and hold them to honest judgment.
Out again [among] the shrewd Jews, Pilate soon went
To hear their accusations when they would not come in.)

This sense of evil could also be applied to dangerous animals or things, as well as to misbehaving children.

The misogynistic association with women appears by the early fourteenth century, as can be seen in this lyric, “Lord that Lenest Us Lyf.,” found in the manuscript London, British Library, MS Harley 2253:

Nou hath prude the pris
In everuche plawe;
By mony wymmon unwis
Y sugge mi sawe,
For yef a ledy lyne is
Leid after lawe,
Uch a strumpet that ther is
Such drahtes wol drawe
             In prude:
       Uch a screwe wol hire shrude
       Thah he nabbe nout a smoke hire foule ers to hude!

(Today, pride takes the praise in every amusement; by the example of many unwise women I state my opinion, for if a lady’s clothing is fitted after fashion, each strumpet that there is will follow such tricks out of pride, each shrew will adorn herself up, though she hasn’t a smock to hide her foul ass.)

And the sense of a nagging or disagreeable wife can be found in Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, c.1395. where the host, Harry Bailey, responds to the merchant’s tale with the following:

"Ey! Goddes mercy!" seyde oure Hooste tho,
"Now swich a wyf I pray God kepe me fro!
Lo, whiche sleightes and subtilitees
In wommen been! For ay as bisy as bees
Been they, us sely men for to deceyve,
And from the soothe evere wol they weyve;
By this Marchauntes tale it preveth weel.
But doutelees, as trewe as any steel
I have a wyf, though that she povre be,
But of hir tonge, a labbyng shrewe is she,
And yet she hath an heep of vices mo.

(“Ah, God’s mercy!” said our host then, “Now such a wife I pray God keep me from! Lo, what slights and subtleties are in women! For they are always as busy as bees, to deceive us innocent men, and from the truth they will ever waver; by this merchant’s tale it is well proven. But doubtless, as true as any steel I have a wife, though she is poor, but of her tongue she is a blabbing shrew, and yet she has a heap of other vices.”)

The adjective shrewd was also applied specifically to scolding or nagging women at about this time. From John Trevisa’s c.1387 translation of Ranulf Higden’s Polychronicon:

Socrates hadde tweie schrewed wifes þat would alway chide and stryve, and hadde ofte stryf by twene hem for Socrates.

(Socrates had two shrewd wives that would always quarrel and argue, and there was often strife between them over Socrates.)

Higden’s original Latin uses litigiosissimas (most quarresome). Another, anonymous, Middle English translator uses litigious and malicious.

But by the early sixteenth century, shrewd was being used to mean clever or keen-witted, an outgrowth of the idea of a malicious act being sharp and penetrating. This sense appears in a 1525 interlude by John Rastell on the qualities of women, although while the attitude displayed here is sexist, the adjective shrewd is applied to men, not women:

Gyff tokyns of loue by many subtell ways
Semyng to be shepe and serpently shrewd
Craft in them renewyng that neuer decays
Theyre seyenge sightynge prouokynge theyr plays
O what payn is to fulfyll theyre appetyte
And to accomplysh theyre wanton delytis

(Give tokens of love by many subtle ways
Seeming to be sheep and serpently shrewd
Craft in them renewing that never decays
Their saying sighting provoking their plays
O what a pain it is to fulfill their appetite
And to accomplish their wanton delights.)

Over time, the adjective shrewd has lost its misogynistic undertones.

Regardless of whether this misogynistic sense of shrew comes from a slander of an innocent animal or from an old German word for devil, its derogatory and slanderous nature makes it not a good word to use unless, one is referring to the title of the Shakespeare play, and even then, one should avoid it as much as possible.

Discuss this post


Sources:

(For those interested in reading more about medieval misogyny, I point you to the work of Carissa M. Harris, whose forthcoming book and talks on the topic have influenced my thinking about the word shrew. As of this writing however, I would recommend her Obscene Pedagogies: Transgressive Talk and Sexual Education in Late Medieval Britain (Cornell UP, 2018). That book does not address misogyny or shrew in particular, but it does address medieval attitudes toward and language about women more generally.)

Brown, Beatrice Daw. The Southern Passion. Early English Text Society OS 169. London: Humphrey Milford, 1927, lines 1282–86, 46–47. HathiTrust Digital Archive. Cambridge, Magdalene College, MS Pepys 2344.

Cartlidge, Neil, ed. The Owl and the Nightingale. Exeter: U of Exeter Press, 2001, 8–9, lines 283–93. London, British Library, Cotton Caligula A.9.

Chaucer, Geoffrey. “Epilogue to the Merchant’s Tale.” The Canterbury Tales, lines 4:2419–29. Harvard’s Geoffrey Chaucer Website. Elyot, Thomas. Bibliotheca Eliotæ Eliotis Librarie. London: Thomas Bertelet, 1542, sig. Y.3

Fein, Susanna Greer, ed. “Lord that Lenest Us Lyf.” The Complete Harley 2253 Manuscript, vol. 2 of 3. TEAMS Middle English Text Series. Kalamazoo, Michigan: Medieval Institute Publications, 2014, lines 12–22. London, British Library, MS Harley 2253.

Higden, Ranulf. Polychronicon Ranulphi Higden, vol. 3 of 8. Joseph Rawson Lumby, ed. Rolls Series (Rerum Britannicarum Medii Aevi Scriptores) 41. London: Longman, et al., 1871, 3.285, 284–85. Cambridge, St. John's College, MS H.1 (204). London, British Library, MS Harley 2261.

Horstmann, Carl, ed. The Early South-English Legendary. Early English Text Society, OS 87.. London: N. Trübner, 1887, 44, lines 347–53. HathiTrust Digital Archive. Oxford, Bodleian Library, Laud Misc. 108, Part 1.

Middle English Dictionary, 2019, s.v. shreue, n., bishreuen, v., shrewd, adj.

Oxford English Dictionary, second edition, 1989, s.v. shrew, n.1, shrew, n.2 and adj., shrewd, adj.

Rastell, John. A New Comodye in Englysh In Maner of an Enterlude Ryght Elygant & Full of Craft of Rethoryk, Wherein Is Shewd & Descrybyd as Well the Bewte & Good Propertes of Women. London, 1525, sig. A.3. Early English Books Online (EEBO).

Image credit: James Gillray, 1791, Library of Congress. Public domain image.

old army game

Indochinese soldiers playing chuck-a-luck in France shortly after the World War I armistice. A crowd of Asian men in uniform gathered round a blanket on which are bets and a cup and saucer, presumably holding dice.

Indochinese soldiers playing chuck-a-luck in France shortly after the World War I armistice. A crowd of Asian men in uniform gathered round a blanket on which are bets and a cup and saucer, presumably holding dice.

23 June 2021

The old army game is a phrase that has gone through a number of different meanings over the years. It started out as a name for a gambling game—exactly which one varies with the telling—shifted to refer to a sucker’s game—like three-card-monte—and then came to mean any kind of confidence game or deception. Meanwhile, in baseball it developed three distinct and contradictory senses.

The earliest use I have found of army game is as another name for the game commonly called chuck-a-luck. It apparently got that name because of chuck-a-luck’s popularity among soldiers during the 1861–65 U.S. Civil War. The particular use, however, is from a chapter subtitle in William Rideing’s 1879 travelogue, A-Saddle in the Wild West, and the army game is great, not old:

The Great Army Game of “Chuck-a-Luck”

For those unfamiliar with the game, John Philip Quinn’s 1890 book on gambling, Fools of Fortune, gives a description of chuck-a-luck and explains that while the game can be played on the level, a skilled player can easily rig it to take money from the unsuspecting:

CHUCK-A-LUCK

This is a simple little game of dice, yet one of the most fascinating of all games of chance. It is sometimes designated as “the old army “game,” [sic] for the reason that soldiers at the front were often wont to beguile the tedium of a bivouac by seeking relief from monotony in its charms.

The outfit requisite to play the game is simple and inexpensive, consisting of three small dice, a dice-box, and a cloth on which are inscribed the numbers one to six, corresponding to the dots, or "pips," on the six faces of the cubes. Bets are made by placing the money wagered on the numbers on the cloth. The dice, having been placed in the box, are shaken and thrown upon the table. Bets made upon either of the three numbers which come uppermost are won by the players. Money staked on either of the remaining numbers are won by the bank.

On its face, this game appears to be one of pure chance. As played upon fair and circus-grounds, however, there is very little chance about it. The “banker” does not throw the dice fairly. Through long practice, he is able to retain two of them between the fingers of the hand which he holds over the inverted dice-box. The other die he allows to remain in the box, and rattles it against the sides, occasionally knocking the box itself against the button of his coat in order to simulate the sound produced by the shaking of three dice. When he removes his hand from the mouth of the dice cup, he drops upon the table the two dice which he held in his hand and permits the third die to fall by chance. The reader will perceive, that he thus makes himself absolutely certain as to two of the faces which will be exposed when the cup is lifted. When it is remembered, that the box is not agitated until all the bets have been made, it will be readily perceived how great is the unfair advantage thus obtained

Other early appearances of old army game use it to describe other or unspecified games of chance. From the Augusta, Georgia Daily Chronicle & Constitutionalist of 23 February 1882:

A large number of gentlemen were at the Fair Grounds yesterday.

“The old army game”—three win and three lose—was popular.

And there is this account from the Cleveland Plain Dealer of 15 May 1887 which is vague on exactly what the game was:

A faro bank was seldom lacking in one of these places, but was never extensively patronized, probably because it was the “squarest” game of them all.

Then there was what they called “the old army game,” of which I remember very little except that those who played always lost.

And there is this from the Omaha Daily World-Herald of 11 August 1890:

Every skin game known to the world was run openly and above board. Under every good shade tree a roulette outfit, chuckaluck, three-card monte, the old army game, faro and numerous other gambling devices were in full operation. The shekels rolled in profusely. Suckers appeared at every turn.

And given this association with rigged games of chance, it should be no surprise that old army game generalized to refer to any deception or confidence game. There is this article from the 24 May 1910 Jersey Journal that uses old army game to refer to what can only be described as a predecessor to the “Nigerian prince” email scam so familiar to us today. Hollywood likes to portray con men as imaginative and brilliant, but in reality, they aren’t; they use the same old tricks their great-grandfathers did:

“THE OLD ARMY GAME”

A letter believed to have been sent in the interests of an old confidence game was received by C. Caborrelli, of 3863[?] Hudson Boulevard, yesterday. The epistle is written in Spanish and bears a Madrid postmark. The is no signature to it beyond the initial, “D. Del O.” The writer is, according to the letter, confined in a Spanish prison for debt. He asks that Caborelli help him by getting his trunk out of the hands of railway authorities who are holding it at a station in France. The writer says there are 1,300,000 francs in the trunk which he will gladly give to Caborrelli for releasing the attachment on the trunk and other baggage. In conclusion the writer asks that a reply be sent to his valet, Sabastian Romero, in Madrid. The letter was turned over to the police of the Sixth Precinct, and later to Police Headquarters.

But we also see the old army game used in baseball, and in ways that are difficult to reconcile with both the gambling senses and with each other. At first, the phrase in baseball parlance referred to a style or tactic of defensive play, perhaps one involving some kind of deception, but exactly what is unclear. Here is an early use from the 6 September 1903 issue of the Pittsburg [sic] Press about a game between the Pirates and the Cincinnati Reds, in which Pittsburgh’s hitting dominated the game:

The Reds tried to work the old army game in the fourth inning, but Sebring lined one out between Beckley and Daly, and Bransfield tallied.

And there is this decades-later description of a local baseball game in the Miami Herald of 5 May 1930:

Davis led off with a hit to left and Vegue laid down a bunt. Marks threw to second, but Davis beat the throw to the bag and two men were on with none down. Then Gahan pulled the old army game on Vegue and tagged him out at first.

The second baseball sense is that of an aggressive style of play, involving bunts, base stealing, hit-and-run plays, and the like. While one might compare this style of play with the patter and movements of a three-card-monte dealer or shell-game operator, there is nothing illegal or illicit about this style of play. Here is an example of an unsuccessful attempt to work the offensive old army game from the Indianapolis Star of 10 June 1909:

The Brewers tried bravely to work the old army game, but it didn’t get them anything when Hostetter singled and Collins sacrificed in the fifth and Barry and Randall repeated the operation in the sixth and Hostetter and Collins came back with the same old stunt in the seventh.

But old army game could also mean exactly the opposite, a strategy that relies on slugging and long balls. From the Cleveland Plain Dealer of 3 May 1908:

The “old army game” as we call it, the style adopted by a team of sluggers that go up to the bat relying upon their batting strength to win out, will never win a pennant nowadays.

So, in the case of baseball, the old army game is what we call a Janus phrase, one that has meanings that are diametrically opposed to one another.

Discuss this post


Sources:

“Baseball Notes.” Pittsburg [sic] Press (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania), 6 September 1903, 20. ProQuest Historical Newspapers.

“Brevities.” Daily Chronicle & Constitutionalist (Augusta, Georgia), 23 February 1882, 4. Readex: America’s Historical Newspapers.

Copeland, H.G. “Champs Crawl Up on Losing Brewers.” Indianapolis Star, 10 June 1909, 8. ProQuest Historical Newspapers.

Dickson, Paul. The Dickson Baseball Dictionary, third edition. Skip McAfee, ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2009, 594, s.v. old army game.

Green’s Dictionary of Slang, 2021, s.v. army, n.2.

Lighter, J.E., ed. Random House Dictionary of Historical Slang: A–G, vol. 1 of 2. New York: Random House, 1994, 35, s.v. army game, n.

“No Post-Mortems in Buses for Manager Hughey Jennings.” Cleveland Plain Dealer (Ohio), 3 May 1908, 2–C. Readex: America’s Historical Newspapers.

“The Old Army Game.” The Jersey Journal (Jersey City, New Jersey), 24 May 1910, 1. Readex: America’s Historical Newspapers.

“Pressmen at Their Picnic.” Omaha Daily World-Herald (Nebraska), 11 August 1890, 2. Readex: America’s Historical Newspapers.

Quinn, John Philip. Fools of Fortune: Or Gambling and Gamblers. Chicago: G.L. Howe, 1890, 275–76. HathiTrust Digital Archive.

Rideing, William H. A-Saddle in the Wild West. New York: D. Appleton, 1879, 139. HathiTrust Digital Archive.

“Shoe Store Defeats Turner’s in Twelfth.” Miami Herald (Florida), 5 May 1930, 7. Readex: America’s Historical Newspapers.

“A Tramp Trip Across the Lava Beds of Idaho and Back Again.” Cleveland Plain Dealer (Ohio), 15 May 1887, 11. Readex: America’s Historical Newspapers.

Photo credit: Frank Chircosta, 21 November 1918, Nievre, France. U.S. Army Signal Corps photo. U.S. National Archives. Public domain image.