mammoth

A wooly mammoth. A photograph of a model on display at the Royal British Columbia Museum in Victoria. A large, hairy elephant-like creature with enormous tusks.

4 November 2022

[5 November: made corrections to the discussion of Mansi in the second paragraph]

The mammoth is any of a number of extinct species of the genus Mammuthus in the order Proboscidea, an order whose only surviving members are the elephants. Temporally, the mammoth ranged from the Pliocene (some five million years ago) into our current epoch, the Holocene, as recently as some 4,000 years ago. Geographically, early mammoth fossils have been found in Africa, but for most of its existence the mammoth ranged across Eurasia and North America. Mammoth is also an adjective for anything large.

The name mammoth probably originates in a Mansi dialect from the compound *mēmoŋt, meaning earth-horn, a reference to the animal’s tusks. The word in present-day Mansi is maxar (earth-stag). Mansi, formerly known as Vogul, is a group of Uralic languages spoken in Siberia. The Uralic family is a grouping of non-Indo-European languages that includes Hungarian, Finnish, and Estonian. The Mansi word was borrowed into Russian in the late sixteenth century as the word mamant (modern spelling mamont), and from there into English and other Western European languages in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The loss of the / n / and the gain of / θ / in these Western European languages is unexplained but may have been influenced by the pronunciation of behemoth.

The Russian word starts making its way into English in the early seventeenth century, but at first only as mentions of the Russian word rather than as Anglicized use. For instance, Richard Finch, a member of an expedition to Siberia on behalf of the London-based Muscovy company, wrote the following in August 1611 in a letter to his corporate masters:

Likewise being at Pechora, Oust Zilma, or any of those parts, there is in the Winter time to bee had among the Samoyeds, Elephants teeth, which they sell in pieces according as they get it, and not by weight. And I haue beene told, they sell the same at a very small rate. It is called in Russe, Mamanta Kaost.

The word appears in a Russian-English lexicon in 1618, but only as a Russian word. English scholar Richard James traveled to Russia in that year, and his notes include the first Russian-English dictionary, which included this entry, which references an old Siberian legend that has the mammoth dwelling underground, a giant mole of sorts, an explanation for why its remains are found buried:

maimanto, as they say a sea eleφant, which is never seene, but accordinge to the Samȣtes he workes himself under grownde and so they finde his teeth or hornes or bones in Pechore and Nova Zemla, of which they make table men in Russia.

(Samȣtes is a reference to the Samoyed people. A table man is a piece or counter used in a game, such as a chess piece.)

Such early references to the Russian word, found in obscure sources, do not appear to have influenced later adoption of mammoth into English.

By the end of the seventeenth century, the word was being used in English but with Russian inflections. From a 1698 translation of Henry William Ludolf’s Some Curious Observations Concerning the Products of Russia:

The Mammotovoy, which is dug out of the Earth in Siberia, is very well worth taking notice of. The common People in Russia relate surprising things concerning its Origin. For they say, they are the Bones of certain Animals, which exceed in bigness any living Creature upon Earth; They make use of it in Physick, as we do of the Unicorn. A friend of mine presented me with a piece of it, which he said was given him by a Muscovite, who had brought it himself out of Siberia, which appears to me to be nothing else than a true Ivory. The more understanding Sort believe them to be Elephants Teeth, which ever since the time of the Deluge, have lain thus under ground.

But by the beginning of the eighteenth century we see mammoth being fully Anglicized. From a translation from the Dutch of E. Ysbrants Ides’s 1706 Three Years Travels from Moscow Over-Land to China:

But the old Siberian Russians affirm that the Mammuth is very like the Elephant; with this only difference, that the Teeth of the former are firmer, and not so straight as those of the latter. They also are of Opinion, that there were Elephants in this Country before the Deluge, when this Climate was warmer, and that their drowned bodies floating on the surface of the Water of that Flood, were at last wash’d and forced into Subterranean Cavities: But that after this Noachian Deluge the Air which was before warm was changed to cold, and that these Bones have lain frozen in the Earth ever since, and so are preserved from putrefaction till they thaw, and come to light; which is no very unreasonable conjecture.

The adjectival use of mammoth to refer to something that is large is in place by the beginning of the nineteenth century. Thomas Jefferson uses it to refer to a side of veal in two letters of 22 October 1801. In one, he thanks the senders of the meat:

I recieved [sic] on the 20th. your favor of the 17th. and this morning arrived the quarter you were so kind as to send me of the Mammoth-veal. tho’ so far advanced as to be condemned for the table, yet it retained all the beauty of it’s appearance, it’s fatness & enormous size. a repetition of such successful examples of enlarging the animal volume will do more towards correcting the erroneous opinions of European writers as to the effect of our climate on the size of animals, than any thing I have been able to do.

In the second, he notes the “Mammoth-veal” weighed 438 pounds.

One of the impetuses of the Lewis and Clark expedition (1803–06) was to combat the idea, common in Europe at the time, that American species were diminutive versions of European ones. Jefferson, enchanted by the finds of mammoth fossils in Russia, hoped the expedition would find living mammoths in the American west. Needless to say, while mammoth fossils can be found in North America, Lewis and Clark did not find any, much less any living specimens of the creature, but this hope may explain Jefferson’s preoccupation with the word.

Discuss this post

---

Sources:

James, Richard. Русско-Английскийй Словарь (Russko-Angliĭskiĭ Slovarʹ; Russian-English Dictionary) (1618–19). Leningrad: Leningrad University, 1959, 181–82.

Jefferson, Thomas. Letter to John Beckley, 22 October 1801. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson.

Jefferson, Thomas. Letter to Michael Fry and Nathan Coleman, 22 October 1801. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson.

Ides, E. Ysbrants. Three Years Travels from Moscow Over-Land to China. London: W. Freeman, et al., 1706, 26. Eighteenth Century Collections Online (ECCO).

Ludolf, Henry William. Some Curious Observations Concerning the Products of Russia. Translated from Latin and included as a supplement to Adam Brand. A Journal of the Embassy from their Majesties John and Peter Alexievitz, Emperors of Muscovy, &c. Over Land into China. London: D. Brown and T. Goodwin, 1698, 122–23. Early English Books Online (EEBO).

Merriam-Webster.com, 4 October 2022, s.v. mammoth, n. and adj.

Oxford English Dictionary, third edition, June 2000, s.v. mammoth, n. and adj.

Purchas His Pilgrimes, vol. 3 of 5. London: William Stansby for Henrie Fetherstone, 1625, 537–38. Early English Books Online (EEBO).

Photo credit: Flying Puffin, 2011. Wikimedia Commons. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.

churl

2 November 2022

The portion of Exeter Cathedral Library MS 3501, fol. 90v quoted below. A tenth-century manuscript written in Anglo-Saxon Square Minuscule.

Churl is a word that isn’t used much anymore, although you will see the adjective churlish from time to time in present-day use, meaning boorish or rude. Churl has a rather straightforward etymology and it’s primarily interesting for its usage in the Old English period, when ceorl was a synonym for a male human.

We see this sense in the poem Beowulf, when Beowulf speaks of how one of Hrothgar’s brothers killed another of his brothers, how he was sentenced to death, and how their father grieved:

Swa bið geomorlic    gomelum ceorle
to gebidanne,     þæt his byre ride
giong on galgan.     Þonne he gyd wrece,
sarigne sang,     þonne his sunu hangað
hrefne to hroðre,     ond he him helpe ne mæg
eald ond infrod    ænige gefremman,
symble bið gemyndgad    morna gehwylce
eaforan ellor-sið.

(Thus, it is mournful for an old churl to live to see his young son swing on the gallows. Then he may tell a tale, a sorrowful song, when his son hangs as a benefit for the raven, and he, old and wise, cannot help to be of any use to him, he will always be reminded each morning of his son’s journey elsewhere.)

It is worth calling out that Hrothgar’s father was a nobleman, so ceorl here carries no connotation of rank. (Cf. earl)

It could also be used more specifically. A ceorl could be a married man, as we see in this passage from the poem that has been dubbed Maxims I. The poem is a collection of proverbs, and this one describes a sailor bringing his dirty clothes back home for his wife to wash:

Scep sceal genægled,     scyld gebunden,
leot linden bord,     leof wilcuma
Frysan wife,     þonne flota stondeð—
biþ his ceol cumen    ond hyre ceorl to ham,
agen ætgeofa,     ond heo hine in laðaþ,
wæsceð his warig hrægl    ond him syleþ wæde niew,
liþ him on londe    þæs his lufu bædeð.

(A ship should be nailed tight, a shield, the light linden boards, bound fast, a dear one made welcome by the Frisian woman, when the ship moors—his boat will have arrived and her churl, her provider, at home, and she leads him inside, washes his dirty clothes and gives him new attire, is gracious to him on land, this his love requires.)

There was a verb form, ceorlian, meaning to marry a man, to take a husband.

And unlike its use in the Beowulf passage above, ceorl could also specify a member of the lowest class of free men, a peasant. Here is a passage from the ninth-century translation of Gregory the Great’s Pastoral Care. The translator was King Alfred (perhaps with help from tutors):

Wietodlice se mæra landbegenga—ðæt wæs sanctus Paulus—he underfeng ða halgan gesomnunga to plantianne ond to ymbhweorfanne, sua se ceorl deð his ortgeard.

(Thus, the great husbandman—that was Saint Paul—he undertook to plant and cultivate the holy congregation, just as the churl does his orchard.)

Prior to the Norman Conquest, a churl was a free man, a respectable estate. But after the Normans took over, many churls were reduced to serfdom, and the word acquired a negative connotation. By the fourteenth century, it had come to mean a person lacking refinement, a boor, and the word was used as a term of abuse. From Chaucer’s Wife of Bath’s Tale, written in the late fourteenth century:

He nys nat gentil, be he duc or erl,
For vileyns synful dedes make a cherl.
For gentillesse nys but renomee
Of thyne auncestres, for hire heigh bountee,
Which is a strange thyng to thy persone.

(He is not noble, be he duke or earl,
For a villein’s sinful deeds make a churl,
For nobility is nothing but renown
Of your ancestors, for their great virtue
Which is a thing apart from your character.)

That’s how churl moved from respectability to a low estate.

Discuss this post

---

Sources:

Chaucer, Geoffrey. “The Wife of Bath’s Prologue and Tale.” The Canterbury Tales. Harvard’s Geoffrey Chaucer Website, lines 1157–61.

Dictionary of Old English: A to I, 2018, s.v. ceorl, n., ceorlian, v.

Fulk, R.D., ed. The Beowulf Manuscript. Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library 3. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2010, lines 2444–51a.

———. The Old English Pastoral Care. Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library 72. Cambridge: 2021, Harvard UP,  3.40, 308.

Middle English Dictionary, 2019, s.v. cherl, n.

Muir, Bernard J. “Maxims I.” The Exeter Anthology of Old English Poetry, vol. 1 of 2. lines 93–99. Exeter Cathedral Library MS 3501, fol. 90v.

Oxford English Dictionary, second edition, 1989, s.v. churl, n., churl, v., churlish, adj.

Image credit: Exeter Cathedral Library and Archives. Public domain image as a mechanical reproduction of a public domain work.

book / beech / throw the book at

A Gutenberg Bible. An old book with black-letter type lies open on a stand, on display at the New York Public Library.

31 October 2022

[2 November 2022: added fact about the Old English plural of boc.]

In Present-Day English, book generally refers to a codex, but originally it could refer to any document or text. The etymology of book is a bit uncertain. It has cognates in other Germanic languages, but the exact root is up for debate.

The traditional etymology has the Old English boc, or book, being related to the word for beech, which could also be spelled boc, the idea being that beech wood was used for writing tablets or that runes would be carved into beech wood or beech bark. This hypothesis has been called into question because the two words are in different noun classes in West Germanic and the book sense is recorded before the beech sense. But these are hardly ironclad arguments. In North Germanic languages, the words occupy the same noun class—Old English was heavily influenced by Old Norse and such classifications are modern structures that are useful as a descriptive tool to linguists today and may not reflect etymology—and gaps in the Old English corpus are so large that any pretense of accurate dating is questionable.

The alternative explanation is that book comes from the Proto-Indo-European root *bhag-, meaning portion or lot, the idea being that runes would be written on pieces of wood used for the casting of lots or that a letter or rune was only a portion of the language. Militating against this is that the Proto-Indo-European root *bhago- gives us the word for beech, further evidence that one must take PIE roots with a grain of salt; they’re what present-day scholars think the language may have looked like, an approximation of the dialects that were spoken some three thousand years ago. And, while the PIE theory is undoubtedly correct in general, the detailed descriptions constructed by present-day scholars may very well be wrong. Perhaps beech wood was used for the casting of lots; who knows?

Here is an example of the use of the Old English boc, meaning book, from Ælfric of Eynsham’s preface to his translation of Genesis. (It’s really a letter to the nobleman who commissioned the work, but the text is generally labeled as a “preface” nowadays.) In the work, Ælfric expresses concern that some readers or audiences might interpret the Bible literally when it is clearly using metaphor:

Hu clypode Abeles blod to Gode buton swa swa ælces mannes misdæda wregað hine to Gode butan wordum? Be ðisum lytlan man mæg understandan, hu deop seo boc is on gaslicum andgyte, ðeah ðe heo mid leohtum wordum awriten sy.

(How did Abel’s blood call out to God, except just as each person’s misdeeds accuse them before God without words? By these little things, one may understand how deep the book is in spiritual meaning, although it is written with plain words.)

A fun little fact is that the Old English plural of boc was bec. This plural persisted through the early Middle English period when it was replaced by the regular / s / plural inflection. Had it not changed, the modern plural of book would be beech.

There was also a verb form of the word, bocian, meaning to grant via charter a piece of land, that is to set the grant down in writing.

The sense of boc meaning beech tree or beech wood is rarer, with only eight appearances in the surviving Old English corpus. All of these are in glosses of Latin texts with the exception of the Old English translation of the Rule of Chrodegang. Chrodegang was an eighth-century Frankish bishop who developed a monastic rule based on that of Benedict. In the Rule, there are regulations regarding how much meat monks could consume, and in one passage Chrodegang addresses the problem of a famine or bad harvest limiting the non-meat protein supply:

Gif hit þonne gebyrað on geare þæt naðer ne byð on þam earde ne æceren ne boc ne oðer mæsten þæt man mæge heora flæscþenunge forð bringan, wite se bisceop oððe se ðe under him ealdor is, þæt hi hit þurh Godes fultum asmeagan þæt hi frofer hæbben & nanne wanan.

(If it happens in a year there are in the land neither acorns nor beech nor other nuts that one may produce for their allowance of meat, the overseeing bishop or he who is senior under him, may resolve it through God’s assistance so that they have solace and do not want.)

(In the above translation, I am using meat to translate flaesc (flesh). The Old English mete, which gives us the present-day meat, referred to food generally, not just the flesh of animals.)

As stated, this sense of boc was rare in Old English and by the Middle English period could only be found in compounds, such as boctreow (beech-tree) and bokeholte (beech woods).

Confusing things further, Old English also had the form bece, which would develop into our modern form beech during the Middle English period. As discussed above, this form may or may not come from the same root as the book sense. We perhaps see this word in opening of the thirteenth-century poem The Owl and Nightingale. The poem survives in two manuscripts, with Oxford, Jesus College MS 29 reading:

Þe nihtegale bigon þo speke
In one hurne of one beche,
& sat vp one vayre bowe,
Þat were abute blostme ynowe,
In ore vaste þikke hegge
I[m]eynd myd spire & grene segge.

(The nightingale began to speak from a niche of a beech and sat upon a fair bough that was covered in blossoms, it was in one vast, thick hedge, mingled with stalks and green sedge.)

The other manuscript, London, British Library, MS Cotton Caligula A.ix reads hurne of one breche (corner of a field). A third possibility is that it is a survival of the Old English bæc or bece, meaning valley. All three words make sense in the context. But in any case, the Present-Day beech descends from the Old English bece.

Shifting gears to the twentieth century, the idiom to throw the book at, meaning to deliver the harshest possible punishment for an offense, does not make literal sense. The idiom is an Americanism that dates to at least 1911, when it appears in George Howard Bronson’s novel An Enemy to Society. Unlike many similar idioms, however, we know what the underlying metaphor is. The passage in this novel explains the metaphor, making sense of the idiom:

If I'd a joined one of these here political clubs or secret organizations and always voted “right” and bin a good “party” man, I'd never done no three years upriver fer burglary. But as soon as they finds you've got no political pull, the judges and all git very moral; throw the book at you and tell you to add up the sentences in it.

At least one origin in all this is clear.

Discuss this post

---

Sources:

Ælfric. “Preface to Genesis.” The Old English Version of the Heptateuch. S.J. Crawford, ed. Early English Text Society O.S. 160. London: Oxford UP, 1922, lines 70–74, 78–79. London, British Library, MS Cotton Claudius B.iv.

American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots Appendix, s.v. bhag-, bhago-.

Atkins, J.W.H., ed. The Owl and the Nightingale. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1922, lines 13–18, 2–5. London, British Library, MS Cotton Caligula A.ix, fol. 233r. Oxford, Jesus College, MS 29, fol. 229r. HathiTrust Digital Archive.

Cartlidge, Neil. The Owl and the Nightingale. Exeter: U of Exeter Press, 2001, 107.

Dictionary of Old English: A to I, 2018, s.v. boc1, n., boc2, n., bocian, v., bece, n., bæc2, n.

Howard, George Bronson. An Enemy to Society. Garden City, New York: Doubleday, Page, 1911, 42. HathiTrust Digital Archive.

Merriam-Webster New Book of Word Histories. Springfield, Massachusetts: Merriam-Webster, 1991, s.v. book.

Middle English Dictionary, 2019, s.v. bok-, n.2., beche, n., brech(e, n.

Napier, Arthur S., ed. The Old English Version of the Enlarged Rule of Chrodegang Together with the Latin Original. Early English Text Society O.S. 150. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1916, 6.9–13, 15. HathiTrust Digital Archive.

Oxford English Dictionary, third edition, March 2014, s.v. book, n., book, v.; second edition, 1989, s.v. beech, n.

Photo credit: Kevin Eng, 2009. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.

Gaul / Gallic / Gaelic

The Dying Gaul. An ancient Roman statue (c. 225 BCE) depicting a defeated warrior from Galatia in Anatolia. A marble statue of a naked man sitting on his shield with a sword and a horn lying next to him. He is slumped, with his head bowed. A Celtic torc is around his neck, and there is a sword wound in his side.

28 October 2022

Despite bearing a superficial resemblance and referring to Celtic peoples, languages, or lands, Gaelic is etymologically unrelated to Gaul and Gallic. None of these have a direct lineal descent from one another; all are the result of multiple borrowings from multiple languages.

Gaul and Gallic are from the Latin Gallia (the country), Gallus (the people), and Gallicus (adjective for both). Generally understood today to include what is now France and Belgium, Gallia or Gaul originally included what is now northern Italy. The origin of the Latin root is uncertain, but it probably comes from a Celtic language or languages. It’s cognate with the Greek Γαλάται and Galatia/Galatian, which refer to Celtic peoples who settled in Asia Minor. It’s also cognate to the Germanic root which gives us Wales and Welsh, as well as Walloon. The exact relationships between all these roots are uncertain.

The Celtic languages spoken in Ireland and Britain, that is Insular Celtic, are divided into two major groups. The Brittonic languages were those spoken in what is now England, Cornwall, and Wales, as well as in Brittany in what is now France. The Goidelic languages were spoken in what is now Scotland, Ireland, and the Isle of Man. Gaelic is the English form of the Old Irish Goídelc (present-day Gaelige), the Scottish Gàidhlig, and the Manx Gaelg.

Scottish Gaelic or Gàidhlig is not to be confused with Scots, which is a Germanic language closely related to English. Whether you consider Scots to be a distinct language or a dialect of English depends on your opinion regarding Scottish nationalism; the distinction between a dialect and a language is a political, not a linguistic, one.

And confusing things even further, Goídelc, Gàidhlig, and Gaelg are not originally Goidelic words. They’re borrowings from Brittonic, the root that gives us the Welsh Gwyddeleg (Irish) and Gwyddel (Irishman). It’s not unusual for the names of peoples, that is demonyms, and languages to be coined by outsiders.

The use of Gaul in English to refer to the ancient people of what is now France dates to the fourteenth century, while the extended nominal sense and the adjective Gallic referring to present-day French people appear in the seventeenth century.

Gaelic also dates to the seventeenth century.

Discuss this post

---

Sources:

Oxford English Dictionary, third edition, June 2018, s.v. Gaelic, n. and adj., Gael, n.; March 2022, s.v. Gaul, n. and adj.; September 2022, s.v. Welsh, adj. and n.; second edition, 1989, s.v. Gallic, adj.1 and n., Gallo-, comb. form1 (this last entry’s etymology was revised in March 2022).

Image credit: Anthony Majanlahti, 2005. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license. The statue is in the Capitoline Museums in Rome.

chad

A man examines a punch-card ballot in the 2000 Palm Beach County, Florida election. A man stares intently at a punch card that is being held in a stand that is the shape of a human hand.

26 October 2022

(This entry is about the keypunch detritus. If you’re looking for the origin of the cartoon character Mr. Chad, see the Kilroy entry.)

The Florida vote-counting debacle during the 2000 US presidential election brought the rather obscure and obsolescent word chad to the attention of the public. A chad is that bit of paper left behind when punch cards and paper tape are perforated. Since by the year 2000 most of the computing world had abandoned punch cards and paper tape, the term had fallen out of use except in specialized applications, such as voting.

The origin of the word is uncertain, with several possible explanations having merit. While chads have been with us since automated machinery was introduced into 18th century textile mills at the beginning of the industrial revolution, the word chad itself is relatively new and the name only appears toward the end of the technology’s life cycle.

The first known use of chad was unearthed by researcher Douglas Wilson, found in a 1930 patent application (US Patent 1,884,755):

There is also provided a receptacle or chad box 175 (Fig. 1 [sic]) adapted to be removably inserted between the vertical arms of bracket 68 (Fig. 6) and disposed below die 72 to receive the chips cut from the edge of the tape.

(Note: the patent application has an error; the drawing of the chad box is on Figure 2, not Figure 1.)

A 1938 patent application (US Patent 2,213,223) links the word chad with chaff:

Positioned above the code punches 13 is a chaff or chad chute 101.

And there is this 1939 patent application (US Patent 2,308,554) that describes the problem of hanging chads, although it does not use that phrase. In the device described, the hanging chads are considered a feature, not a bug:

Prior devices of the type according to the present invention have been arranged to cut out the perforations completely at a single movement, thereby producing chads or pieces of waste material which often present difficult problems of disposal. To avoid the necessity of disposing of this waste material by preventing its formation, the present invention provides a perforating arrangement whereby the perforations are not completely cut out, but the chads are permitted to remain attached to the perforated material (for example, tape), the preferred arrangement being such that the punches are utilized to so pierce the material as to leave an uncut portion which serves as a hinge, thus resulting in a hinged lid which will yield to the sensing pins in a telegraph transmitter when the tape is employed for automatic control of signal transmission.

Note that all three of these patents are by men working for the Teletype Corporation, and a Howard Krum was one of the inventors of the first two. Because of this, it’s tempting to think that chad was a coinage of or restricted in use to the engineers at the Teletype Corporation, but it’s more likely that the word was a term of art in the industry by 1938.

So where does it come from? There are several, possibly all related, words from other industries that are similar. One such is the Scots word chad. Jamieson’s 1808 Etymological Dictionary of the Scottish Language gives the following definition, and the much more recent Scottish National Dictionary repeats it:

CHAD, s. Gravel, such small stones as form the bed of rivers, S.B.
Teut. Schadde, cespes, gleba; or rather, kade, litus, ora, Kilian; q. the beach which generally consists of gravel. Belg. kaade, a small bank. Hence,
CHADDY, adj. Gravelly; as, chaddy ground, that which consists of gravel, S.

It is a small semantic leap from the detritus from a quarry that is used for gravel to paper refuse from a punch card.

There is also an English dialectal use of chad, a variant of the more common chat, meaning a chip of wood or small twig used for firewood. Hence the dialectal chattocks or chatwood, the detritus left after gathering up firewood.

Or the paper chad could simply be a variation on chaff.

There are two proffered explanations that we can definitely discount though. Chad is sometimes said to have come from a certain Mr. Chadless, who invented a chadless keypunch. Chad, in this explanation, is a back formation from chadless. But no record of any such man has been found and what evidence we do have suggests that chadless followed chad, not the other way around.

The second false explanation is that it is an acronym for Card Hole Aggregate Debris. As with most proffered acronymic origins, this one is bogus on its face.

Discuss this post

---

Sources:

Jamieson, John. An Etymological Dictionary of the Scottish Language, vol. 1 of 2. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1808, s.v., chad, n. HathiTrust Digital Archive.

Krum, Howard L. (inventor). “US Patent 1,884,755, Coupon Printer.” United States Patent Office, application 16 October 1930, patented 25 October 1932, 7. Google Patents.

Krum, Howard L. and Albert H. Reiber (inventors). “US Patent 2,213,223, Telegraph Transmitter.” United States Patent Office, application 18 July 1938, patented 3 September 1940, 4. Google Patents.

Oxford English Dictionary, second edition, 1989, s.v. chad, n.2., chat, n.3.

Scottish National Dictionary. Dictionaries of the Scots Language/Dictionars o the Scots Leid (DSL), version 3.0, 2022, s.v. chad, n..

Swan, Carl W. (inventor). “US Patent 2,308,554, Printing Telegraph Apparatus.” United States Patent Office, application 20 May 1939, patented 19 January 1943, 1. Google Patents.

Wilson, Douglas G. with notes by Gerald Cohen. “Two Early Attestations of Chad ‘Paper Chip(s)[’], Including an Antedating to 1930.” Comments on Etymology, vol. 36, no. 5, 18–19. (Note: Wilson gives an incorrect patent number for the second, 1940, patent.)

Wright, Joseph. The English Dialect Dictionary, vol. 1 of 6. London: Henry Frowde, 1898, 567, s.v. chat, n.

Photo credit: Mark T. Foley, 2000. State Library and Archives of Florida. Wikimedia Commons. Public domain image.