Audio Pareidolia

5 July 2008

I’ve long been aware of the phenomenon of pareidolia, the seeing of recognizable objects, usually faces, in random visual stimuli. Famous examples of pareidolia include the “face” on the Cydonia Mensae region of Mars or images of the Virgin Mary on pieces of toast. Our brains are really good at pattern recognition, so good in fact that we often detect “meaningful” patterns in random data. We commonly see faces because our brains are “hardwired” to be particularly good at identifying faces.

But until today, I had always associated pareidolia with visual perception. But that’s not the case. We’re also really good at picking out “speech” from random noise. Like the visual version, this skill is a two-edged sword; it allows us to eavesdrop on a conversation from across the room at a crowded cocktail party, but it also gives us “Satanic” messages when rock music is played backwards or ghostly voices created by the wind in a spooky house. Like it is for facial recognition, our brain is hardwired for speech recognition and linguistic capability and it’s so good at it that we often hear speech when there really is any there.

Brian Dunning at Skeptoid.com has an excellent podcast on the topic from a few weeks ago (a transcript is available on the site if you don’t want to listen).

A really good example of audio paredolia is this sample that Dunning references. Listen to it the first time and it sounds like a bunch of high-pitched tones. But listen to it several times and your brain will pick out more and more “words” each time until it sounds like a perfectly normal English sentence. (I’m posting the sentence below as a comment so you won’t be influenced by knowing what it is in advance. If you hear a different sentence or are a non-native English speaker and hear a sentence in a different language, please post a comment about what you hear below.)

Dunning has other examples you can hear in his podcast and transcript.

This YouTube video is a humorous take on the phenomenon, where someone has added English subtitles to the Hindi (or whatever language it is) in this clip from a Bollywood musical.

OED June 2008 Update

13 June 2008

The online OED has just published another quarterly update, revising the entries from quittal to ramvert. New words added to the dictionary include subprime, adj.; wantaway, adj.; cookie cutter, n. & adj.; and radiophysics, n.1; this last referring to branch of physics dealing with ionizing radiation; the original entry, which is now radiophysics, n.2, refers to the physics of radio waves.

Grant Barrett On “How To Buy a Dictionary”

30 April 2008

Grant Barrett, over at The Lexicographer’s Rules has an article on what criteria to use when buying a dictionary.

His comment on etymology makes me a bit uncomfortable. Although he’s right that etymology is not an absolute requirement for most everyday uses. If you’re going to invest $30+ for a good dictionary that will last you several years, you should get one with etymologies. Chances are, you will want to look up a word’s origins at some point.

And note that his criteria apply equally well to evaluating online dictionaries.

OED March Update

14 March 2008

The Oxford English Dictionary has released its quarterly update for this Spring and it’s different than past updates. To date, the updates for the new, third edition have proceeded alphabetically starting with the letter M. By that schedule, this update should have covered from quits to somewhere in the letter R. But instead, this time around the editors chose to update selected words from throughout the alphabet, plus the words that surround these selections. These selections include American, and, climate, compute, fuck, gay, genetics, and love. The words were selected because they have undergone significant change since they were last revised, with additional meanings and forms, or because they have complex semantic, syntactic, or etymological issues that need new explication.

Next quarter will pick up with quits and each subsequent quarter will alternate between an alphabetical range and an updating of select words. This will allow the editors more flexibility in updating those words that are seeing rapid change in modern English and will make the OED a more useful reference.